Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Hovercrafts and revenge
A cool Hindi and a cool Bengali phrase I found.
This gentleman will pay for everything . यह श्रीमान सब कुछ चुकता करेंगे. Yah śrīmān sab kuch cuktā kareṅge.
My hovercraft is full of eels. আমার হভারক্রাফ্ট কুঁচে মাছ-এ ভরা হয়ে গেছে. Amar hobharkraft kunche machh-e bhora hoye gechhe.
Why saying so?
But anyways. The movie. The movie was entitled "Indrani." We watched said movie.
The movie shows a couple shunned by their families for marrying each other - the two being from entirely different castes. While it didn't seem clear to me, it seemed the woman, Indrani, was a higher-class, maybe a Brahmin, and the guy, who seems to have had several names, was a much lower class who was not only shunned because of his marrying Indrani, but earlier because he "didn't work."
The film is clearly not a propaganda film, but rather an ideological film. It very nicely portrays what it's ideal world is. One where everyone works for the benefits of everyone else, and there is no discrimination, and no elites, and if you take away all outside help, s long as everybody worked together, everything would be fine.
The movie shows Indrani and the dude's relationship struggle to remain stable - much like the relationship between the high and the low castes of the time. The lower castes were becoming restless with feeling so useless and segregated, but the higher castes remained mostly oblivious.
Indrani is busy with work and never spends any time with her husband, who subsequently gets angry with her. He tries to find work, but is repeatedly shunned, so finally he leaves her to help start up a village far away.
Upon hearing of this, Indrani comes to him, gives him a lecture about how grown up he suddenly is, and then the village is struck by lightning and burnt to the ground, and in the aftermath the two embrace, and roll credits.
The film has quite a few songs in it, and, when you get past the horrid translation, actually still don't really make a lick of sense.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjB93TSY0Q1DE-Krz7C8OT5Sk4rcqagTqTE2C8ZgbzmboJ1zdMtNgyqXdp01zaoLwnaByAmqTh7Xp8L2F2FW5UQT17663rJhlOrt68-Jeo-2QWF4-3n9ETLFN33fP-s44jNSfHhWfZ6YzUo/s640/for+fly+to+the+unknown+invitation.png)
Sure it all sounds well and good, but when you dig in it doesn't really do that much. "The stars and moon are drunk." Okay. Yup. What does that mean?
There were some tidbits here and there that made sense. Something about giving up everything for love.
Sacrificing elitism for equality? Maybe. Dunno.
It was a decent film, but honestly - is Indrani, the namesake of the movie, I might add, the villain? Cause she seems that way. A lot of the dude's hardships are her fault. For Pte's Sake, they were married, and she refused to sleep in the same room. (Is it some strange Indian cultural thingamajig?)
Tuesday, October 20, 2015
Nucluear bombs, aliens, irradiated bugs, and more aliens - who *wouldn't* want to watch something like that?
Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Sounds real hilarious don't it? So does
Invasion of the Mind Swappers from Asteroid 6!
But the trick is that both sound equally interesting. As stupid and dumb and hilarious and hilariously stupidly dumb as both of these sound, don't they also sound really darn interesting to you? Don't you want to know more? That's the trick to all these 1950s-1970s Horror movie names. No games, no subtlety, no beating around the bush, just simple, long as heck, and straight to the point. In this day and age, you sure as heck wouldn't see a horror movie called Attack of the 50-Foot Woman. No freaking way. Instead, it's be called The 50-Foot Woman, if we were lucky, but more likely it would be named either by the place in which the fifty-foot woman (who knows, in this modern era, sexism might bend it into a man) makes her "attack," or by the woman's (or, again, man's) name.
Them! is probably the shortest title you'll ever see plastered onto a 50s era movie, or really any movie, for that matter, considering it's one syllable. The shortest movie titles ever actually belong to two movies knows as Z and M. But that's off topic.
Them!
Not only is this the shortest title of the many irradiated monster movies spawned by the 50s, but it's also one of the least descriptive. With other movies, we have War of the Worlds, pretty self-explanatory, considering we only have one world, thus alien invasion, duh-doy, Attack of the 50-Foot Woman, also pretty darn self-explanatory, so does The Day the Earth Stood Still, It Came From Outer Space and The Beast From 20,000 Fathoms. Sensing a pattern? You should.
Enough about titles though. Why were all these classic, much-loved horror movies all cranked out in the Cold War era? What do they all have in common? Both of those questions can be answered with one question.
Above: Self-explanatory. You are not five. This is an
article aboutthe Cold War. You see before you a red
explosion in the shape of a mushroom. Extrapolate.
If the answer you took away from that was "mushroom" or "cloud" or even "mushroom cloud" then I'm afraid I've got bad news for you: you're wrong. Yes. I'm sorry, but you're wrong. The correct answer is "nukes," or "nuclear bombs." Five points from Gryffindor.
In Invasion of the Body Snatchers, we see alien "seedpods" from outerspace landing on Earth, growing perfect replicas of the human beings in the town of Santa Mira. When the person whom the pod is growing a replica of falls asleep, they are replaced by the doppelganger. One could easily point out that this is almost blatantly trying indoctrinate Americans with the idea that this is indubitably what will happen in the event of a Communist or Soviet (God forbid, both) takeover.
The film seems, hilariously like it is trying to subtly convince
the watcher that this is indeed the only outcome of socialist rule. We
see mindless drones walking about like zombies towards the end of the
movie - clear symbolism of the brain-dead nature of those, ahem . . .
. . . who are dominated by Communism. The movie seems to want to convey that, in the event of Soviet takeover, human beings will become, as portrayed in the movie, mindless drones.
The moral?
You Communist fool! |
Sunday, October 18, 2015
Lord Birkenhead. Just want to point out how hilarious that name is.
Ghandi. We all know him. Or, at least, have heard of him, at any rate.
Ghandi pulling out a machine gun and shooting
at some baddies James Bond-style in a restaurant
Above is a very real picture of Ghandi.
Okay I joke. This is a screenshot of a very hilarious movie called UHF. There is a section where a trailer for a fake movie plays. The trailer is for Ghandi II, in which Ghandi is a James Bond-style hero fighting a bunch of people. And what makes this so hilarious is the fact that it's the exact opposite of what Ghandi was.
Excuse me, who. Sorry, pronouns always get to me.
Anyways. Ghandi was always a nonviolent kind of guy. He sponsored and led nonviolent protests - sitdown riots. What were those, you ask? Exactly what they sound like. They sat down, and did nothing. Absolutely nothing.
A repressed citizen crying out for release from British tyranny
Let's talk about something else though. How about . . . pop culture! It's in the name of the class blog, is it not? Then let's do such things.
Judging by the videos given to watch, we see that a whole lot of them have, well, a girl in them. Not surprising. Everyone loves girls. Girls are not jerks, unlike men, so who wouldn't love 'em? But let's look at it more carefully. What are the girls doing? Singing. What about? I dunno. Probably love. If it's a Bollywood film and there's a woman singing, you can bet your aforementioned sweet bippy that it's about love.
Clandestine is a funny word
While it is not blatantly obvious from the information given what America's international policies were, some things are clear.
1. They were not afraid to express opinion. It seemed to me that all the Americans in the film were open about how they felt, and weren't too concerned with damaging relations with other countries. America had a reputation as a powerful country. It's people reflected that.
2. They found other cultures intriguing. The whole concept of archaeology is the fascination of other cultures' (or your own culture's, but let's face it, in movies you never see an Egyptian archaeologist digging in Egypt) histories, and the subsequent unearthing (usually literally) of missing links.
In that one Coca-Cola commercial, we saw Egyptians getting hilariously excited about an American beverage. I feel like there's some metaphor here for how America is a fat little kid who gets his dirtly little paws in everyone else's lunch.
Oh wait. I just made one.
In Secret of the Incas, Americans seem to get along reasonably well with the rest of the world. Harry Steele, protagonist of the movie, is seen conversing casually with natives, Peruvians and other nationalities often throughout the movie, and mostly seems to be polite about it. He has a friend who's a barkeep at a hotel, and he is also a tourguide in Peru. We later see a group of Americans running an archaeological expedition in Monte Pichuu. They are working hand in hand with the natives, who are happily assisting them with the promise of finding an ancient, religious artifact they long for:
The Sunburst. I believe I also remember something about archaeology being different than it used to be. More advanced, and a lot more risky. Throughout the film, Harry Steele is shown as an antihero, who's in it only for the money. He's a liar and a thief. But by the end, once he finds the multi-million dollar Sunburst, he returns it to the Natives, and lets them keep it, rather than running away with the money.
1. They were not afraid to express opinion. It seemed to me that all the Americans in the film were open about how they felt, and weren't too concerned with damaging relations with other countries. America had a reputation as a powerful country. It's people reflected that.
2. They found other cultures intriguing. The whole concept of archaeology is the fascination of other cultures' (or your own culture's, but let's face it, in movies you never see an Egyptian archaeologist digging in Egypt) histories, and the subsequent unearthing (usually literally) of missing links.
In that one Coca-Cola commercial, we saw Egyptians getting hilariously excited about an American beverage. I feel like there's some metaphor here for how America is a fat little kid who gets his dirtly little paws in everyone else's lunch.
Oh wait. I just made one.
In Secret of the Incas, Americans seem to get along reasonably well with the rest of the world. Harry Steele, protagonist of the movie, is seen conversing casually with natives, Peruvians and other nationalities often throughout the movie, and mostly seems to be polite about it. He has a friend who's a barkeep at a hotel, and he is also a tourguide in Peru. We later see a group of Americans running an archaeological expedition in Monte Pichuu. They are working hand in hand with the natives, who are happily assisting them with the promise of finding an ancient, religious artifact they long for:
The Sunburst. I believe I also remember something about archaeology being different than it used to be. More advanced, and a lot more risky. Throughout the film, Harry Steele is shown as an antihero, who's in it only for the money. He's a liar and a thief. But by the end, once he finds the multi-million dollar Sunburst, he returns it to the Natives, and lets them keep it, rather than running away with the money.
Tuesday, October 13, 2015
India in the 1950s - a New Republic
India first became a republic on the 26th of January, 1950, and it was then that they got their first president, Dr. Rajendra Prasad.
But let's move on from that. We want to talk about daily life, the government, and mawwiage. Ahem, excuse me, mawwiage. Mawwiage is what bwings us hewe, togetha, today-
Sorry about that. Anyways, we want to talk about daily life, the government, marriage, the things that happened (we call those events, yo) in the 50s in India, and, of course, pop culture, because who doesn't love that? *Raises hand.*
Marriage seems as if it was one of those stereotypical Middle-Ages royalty things where at a stupidly young age, everybody got married off to someone they didn't know and that was that.
What we see in Mr. and Mrs. 55 seems to show somewhat the same thing, though it ends happily with Anita (the chick) falling in love with Preetam (the dude). The aunt, Sita Devi, is a huge women's rights advocate focused on the divorce bill and obsessed with the idea that men are rats. (I was like, "lady, to some extent, that's . . .well, mostly true, but c'mon, benefit of the doubt") She goes about parading her hatred for men in a seemingly reversed version of the Three Stooges Woman Haters musical (which none of us enjoyed all that much - A Plumbing We Will Go is so much better).
Back to the 50s in India. Now obviously it lacked the basics of what we have now, like a time six and a half decades ago likely would. Cellphones, easily accessed transportation, proper cleaning gadgets, or, you know, just . . . gadgets in general. Vacuums weren't all that common. People mostly read, hung out, went to movies maybe. To the uneducated, (illiterate, as Auntie Sita would say) the 50s look pretty darn dull.
I'm afraid I'd have to agree with you there.
But let's move on from that. We want to talk about daily life, the government, and mawwiage. Ahem, excuse me, mawwiage. Mawwiage is what bwings us hewe, togetha, today-
Sorry about that. Anyways, we want to talk about daily life, the government, marriage, the things that happened (we call those events, yo) in the 50s in India, and, of course, pop culture, because who doesn't love that? *Raises hand.*
Marriage seems as if it was one of those stereotypical Middle-Ages royalty things where at a stupidly young age, everybody got married off to someone they didn't know and that was that.
What we see in Mr. and Mrs. 55 seems to show somewhat the same thing, though it ends happily with Anita (the chick) falling in love with Preetam (the dude). The aunt, Sita Devi, is a huge women's rights advocate focused on the divorce bill and obsessed with the idea that men are rats. (I was like, "lady, to some extent, that's . . .well, mostly true, but c'mon, benefit of the doubt") She goes about parading her hatred for men in a seemingly reversed version of the Three Stooges Woman Haters musical (which none of us enjoyed all that much - A Plumbing We Will Go is so much better).
Back to the 50s in India. Now obviously it lacked the basics of what we have now, like a time six and a half decades ago likely would. Cellphones, easily accessed transportation, proper cleaning gadgets, or, you know, just . . . gadgets in general. Vacuums weren't all that common. People mostly read, hung out, went to movies maybe. To the uneducated, (illiterate, as Auntie Sita would say) the 50s look pretty darn dull.
I'm afraid I'd have to agree with you there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)